19 Mar 2013
by Asif J. Mir
in Termination of Employees
Tags: able, agree, cause, change, clause, contain, contract, discharge, employee, Employer, employment, general, good, hire, indefinite, length, mean, negotiate, period, permit, reason, represent, rule, termination, time, union, will
Most employees are hired for an indefinite period. If no length of employment is agreed upon, employment is “at will.” This means that an employer can discharge such an employee at any time for any reason or without giving any reason. Unions generally negotiate a change in this rule for the employees they represent. Most union contracts contain a clause that permits discharge only for good cause.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
10 Mar 2013
by Asif J. Mir
in Reinventing Leadership
Tags: accept, autocratic, better, change, close, Competition, corporation, dehumanizing, demand, deteriorate, difference, employee, eye, fabric, forty, give up, global, head, heart, hour, idea, implement, leader, leadership, level, make, manager, miserable, national, old, Organization, People, powerful, pretty, produce, Product, Quality, reality, reinvent, return, self-esteem, service, simple, social, start, stuff, sustain, today, truly, unhappy, way, week, weekend, work, worker
Many people in today’s organizations are pretty miserable. Unhappy people don’t produce quality services and products. At some level, each one of us knows that. Yet, many leaders and managers have given up. They’ve accepted the idea that employees work forty hours a week only so they can do what they want to do on the weekend. That must be changed, and it can be changed. The realities of the deteriorating social fabric demand that we return self-esteem to workers. The realities of national and global competition demand that leaders start making a difference in their corporations—a difference that truly makes a difference.
There are better ways to run corporations than the old, autocratic, dehumanizing ways. Not only must we implement these better ways; we have to sustain them. You can’t do it with your eyes, head or heart closed. But it’s very simple stuff, and it’s very, very powerful.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
15 Dec 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Change and Gain
Tags: accept, aim, benefit, best, big, built, business, change, close, company, considerable, controversy, create, current, different, direction, easy, emotion, employee, event, fall, fundamental, gain, great, hand, hope, impact, implement, inertia, innovative, limit, major, method, might, modify, Organization, perfect, possible, problem, range, relative, require, rotation, rule, scale, schedule, selection, shift, simple, solve, start, tackle, thin, thumb, time, vacation, way, worker
The best schedule for your business is likely to be very different from your current schedule. Innovative schedules that require major changes are the most likely to give the biggest benefits. On the other hand, the closer the new schedule is to the current schedule, the easier it is for workers to accept. Implementing a current modified schedule is easier but has a limited impact. In some companies even a relatively simple change—new shift start times, changing the direction of rotation, or a new vacation selection method—can create considerable controversy while not solving fundamental scheduling problems. Changing schedules is an emotional event for your employees, so you might as well tackle all of your scheduling problems at the same time.
Ask whether you want to make a small change or a big change. As a rule of thumb, aim for the greatest change possible, because you are not going to get all the way there anyway. Most organizations have a built-in inertia that limits change. On a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being the current schedule and 100 being the perfect schedule, aim for 100, with the hope that your business will fall within the 80 to 90 range.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
27 Aug 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Productivity—the Japanese Way
Tags: adaptation, American, area, automobile, believe, better, business, competitive, concept, corporate, cultural, debunk, define, difficult, diverse, dominate, economist, else, employee, Europe, explain, face, facile, fact, factory, few, fright, gift, great, idea, implication, improve, improvement, incline, increase, industrial, industry, japanese, jump, lead, literal, living, load, manager, market, mean, method, need, North, order, outstrip, pace, Performance, pick, plant, point, potential, produce, Product, productive, productivity, prove, quick, reach, realize, reason, record, relate, run, semi-conductor, sense, standard, study, success, suggestion, superior, surprising, task, technical, tell, unique, valid, wash, way, worker, world
Economists are forever telling us that we need to increase productivity in order to improve our standard of living. Productivity is one of those concepts that are so loaded with meaning and implications that is very difficult to define, much less explain. Not surprisingly then, improving “it” is one of the most difficult tasks facing business. More to the point, the time for improvement is quickly running out. Industrial performance is being outstripped at a frightening pace by the Japanese. In fact, it has reached the point where their productivity performance is so superior that they can literally pick any product and any market and quickly come to dominate it.
The idea that Japanese are uniquely gifted in only a few related areas has been debunked by their proven successes in industries as diverse as automobiles and semi-conductors. As well, the facile suggestion that the Japanese are somehow culturally inclined to be productive doesn’t wash. Japanese managers have taken over factories in Europe and the US and greatly improved productivity records. Productivity has also been high in their North American plants.
If corporate managers believe that their workers can be as competitive as anyone else in the world, and technically, there’s no valid reason why they can’t be, then they must find better ways to help their employees realize their potential. In that sense, study of Japanese methods is a jumping-off point that can lead to adaptations that will produce unique ways of improving productivity.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
19 Aug 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in The Dark Side of Technology
Tags: achieve, assimilate, Brand, clear, concept, Consumer, control, dark, deliver, employee, enable, feeling, ineptitude, isolate, negative, outcome, paradox, People, potential, Product, provide, Quality, sense, service, side, support, technology, way
Although there is clearly great potential for technology to support brand new product concepts, provide new ways of delivering service, and enable consumers and employees in achieving better quality products and services, there are potential negative outcomes as well. There are many paradoxes of technology products and services for consumers. Technology can assimilate people while isolating them; it can provide a sense of control and at the same time feelings of ineptitude.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
09 Aug 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Two-way HR Planning Process
Tags: action, address, adopt, affect, aggregate, analyses, ask, assessment, attune, bottom up, broad, broken, business, change, character, close, company, competitive, concern, condition, consideration, context, cumulative, department, detail, direction, down, economic, effort, employee, environment, external, focus, force, forecast, future, great, guidance, HR, Human, identify, impact, important, influence, information, input, issue, level, long-term, manager, meaningful, necessary, objective, operate, Organization, participate, People, plan, Planning, possible, practice, process, progressive, provide, raise, readily, regarding, require, Resource, select, shape, social, specific, staff, strategic, strategy, synthesize, team, top-down, trend, umbrella, unit, view
Like other business strategies, human resource strategies are shaped through both top-down and bottom-up processes in an organization. A top-down processes provides the strategic context necessary for team and unit planning.
Through a focused company environmental assessment, it provides information on possible future trends and issues affecting the business and influencing the shaping of plans and objectives. People close to the operating business may not readily take such a broad future view. It requires looking outside the company to external competitive practices, economic and social trends, and possible future conditions that may some day have an impact on the business.
A plan is strategic in character if it is focused on important issues raised in an environmental assessment. In today’s competitive organization, it is important that employees at all levels be attuned to external forces and changes and to the strategic direction being taken to address them.
In a bottom-up approach, planning of human resource actions is a cumulative process. Instead of broad strategies being broken down into progressively greater detail, detailed strategies are aggregated and synthesized into meaningful umbrella strategies. Each business unit or department is asked to identify the human resource issues of concern, taking into consideration the guidance of the long-term planning inputs. They are also asked to specific analyses, forecasts, and assessments regarding these issues. Specific action plans are selected and adopted. Both human resource staff and managers should participate in this effort.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
08 Aug 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Building Ethical Safeguards
Tags: awareness, build, company, compass, direction, employee, ethical, guidance, handle, manager, need, Organization, personal, provide, receive, safeguard, several, signal, situation, step
Managers and employees need guidance on how to handle day-t-day ethical situations; their own personal ethical compass may be working well, but they need to receive directional signals from the company. Several organizational steps can be taken to provide this kind of ethical awareness and direction.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
03 Aug 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Quality or Excellence?
Tags: absolute, accomplish, according, achieve, addition, assess, assume, base, better, built, compare, comparison, competence, competency, conformance, continuous, control, design, different, employee, establish, evaluate, evaluation, excellence, goal, individual, level, management, mean, measure, meet, minimum, necessary, Organization, possess, Quality, question, relative, require, requirement, scale, simply, standard, state, strive, term, thing, total, try
The question is what is the organization trying to accomplish? Is it striving for quality, or excellence or both? Quality and excellence are two different terms. Quality is an absolute state—in the control of total quality management, quality is conformance to requirements, doing things according to standards. Excellence is a relative term, to put it simply, it is being better than others. It requires comparison. So it can be said that quality is built in, while excellence is designed. If the goal is quality, it means individuals will be assessed on whether they meet the established standards. It is assumed that they possess the minimum competencies. If the goal is to achieve excellence, individuals will be assessed on their competence levels based on a continuous evaluation scale. Hence when evaluating for excellence, it would be necessary to compare the relative competence between two employees in addition to measuring their competence against the standards scale.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
04 Jun 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in The Human Context of Management
Tags: above, addition, answer, asset, basic, Behavior, benefit, boost, common, company, context, contribution, contributor, cooperate, core, course, create, decision, decision-making, decline, develop, differ, direct, dramatic, element, employee, encourage, expect, expectation, grow, guide, Human, increase, inherent, jobs, labor, learn, live, major, management, manager, need, offer, ongoing, opportunity, Organization, part, participation, People, perspective, possible, problem, problem solving, process, productivity, purpose, question, Resource, return, reverse, right, satisfaction, setting, size, Skill, solve, step, Structure, trend, understand, valuable, vitalize, wage, work
In addition to understanding the ongoing behavioral processes inherent in their own jobs, managers must understand the basic human element of their work. Organizational behavior offers three major perspectives for understanding this context: people as organizations, people as resources, and people as people.
Above all, organizations are people, and without people there would be no organizations. All organizations differ from each other dramatically in size, purpose, and structure, they have one thing in common: people. Thus, if managers are to understand the organizations in which they work, they must first understand the people who make up the organizations.
As resources, people are one of an organization’s most valuable assets. People create the organization, guide and direct its course, and vitalize and revitalize it. People make its decisions, solve its problems, and answer its questions. People are at the core of many of the possible contributors to this trend. To reverse declining productivity, many organizations have taken steps to boost the contribution from their human resources. Some companies have encouraged management and labor to cooperate better; others have increased employee participation in decision-making and problem-solving.
There is another perspective—people as people. People spend a large part of their lives in organizational settings, mostly as employees. They have a right to expect something in return beyond wages and employee benefits. Employees seek satisfaction, and many want the opportunity to grow and develop and to learn new skills. An understanding of organizational behavior can help managers better appreciate these needs and expectations.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
26 May 2012
by Asif J. Mir
in Social Interactions
Tags: affect, authority, autonomous, basic, Behavior, bound, Buying, celebration, center, children, common, community, companionship, consider, contrast, convention, culture, decision-making, define, different, Dutch, economic, education, emerge, employee, establish, example, extended, family, festival, focus, form, framework, fulfill, gadget, get-together, grief, household, husband, include, influence, institutional, interaction, Latin, leader, life, machine, Marketing, marriage, mean, modern, mother, nuclear, occasion, opinion, Organization, pattern, People, personal, play, political, practice, prefer, prescribe, primary, protection, provide, reason, reference, religious, resent, responsibility, ritual, Role, scope, set, situation, social, society, specifically, stable, support, Swiss, unit, US, Value, vary, wife, woman
Social interactions establish the role that people play in a society and their authority responsibility pattern. Their roles and patterns are supported by a society’s institutional framework, which includes, for example, education and marriage.
Social roles are established by culture. For example, a woman can be a wife, a mother, a community leader, and/or an employee. What role is preferred in different situations is culture-bound. Most Swiss women consider household work as their primary role. For this reason, they resent modern gadgets and machines. Behavior also emerges from culture in the form of conventions, rituals, and practices on different occasions such as during festivals, marriages, get-togethers, and times of grief or religious celebration.
With reference to marketing, the social interactions influence family decision-making and buying behavior and define the scope of personal influence and opinion. In Latin America and Asia the extended family is considered the most basic and stable unit of social organization. It is the center for all economic, political, social, and religious life. It provides companionship, protection, and a common set of values with specifically prescribed means for fulfilling them. By contrast, in the US the nuclear family (husband, wife, and children) is the focus of social organization. The US wife plays a more autonomous role than the Dutch wife in family decision-making. Thus social roles vary from culture to culture and are likely to affect marketing behavior.
My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir - Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, and my Lectures.
Previous Older Entries