Reduced Incentive to Invest

The fear of the loss of revenues can reduce a firm’s incentive to invest in a drastic (radical in the economic sense) innovation. If a firm holds a near monopoly position in a market, and knows that by investing in a drastic innovation it will accelerate the introduction time of the innovation, it may not want to invest, all else being equal. The incentive changes if the firm knows that by not investing in the innovation, someone else would. For example, Intel’s Pentium was a drastic innovation since it rendered the 486, for the most part, noncompetitive. If Intel had not introduced the Pentium, there is a good chance that its competitors would have introduced a comparable product.

 My Consultancy–Asif J. Mir – Management Consultant–transforms organizations where people have the freedom to be creative, a place that brings out the best in everybody–an open, fair place where people have a sense that what they do matters. For details please visit www.asifjmir.com, Line of Sight

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: